The Democratic Party Profits From Teachers’ Union Members’ Pedophilia
Ms. Brown is a sharp reporter and a beautiful bride. Please ignore Dan Senor (right), the lucky bastard. |
‘Puter’s happy to see Campbell Brown’s piece in this morning’s Wall Street Journal. Well, ‘Puter wasn’t happy about the piece’s content, but pleased that someone is finally forcing Democrats to confront their horrible double standard.
As Ms. Brown ably details, New York State’s teachers’ unions are not merely content to have lifetime job guarantees and guaranteed annual raises, coupled with insanely generous pensions and benefits. Nay, to consider such a package is to laugh.
Teachers’ unions also want their members to remain teachers even after shown to have molested children. Yes, ‘Puter meant what he wrote there, inflammatory as it is. Teachers’ unions knowingly and unforgivably put child molesters back in the classroom where unwitting parents subject their children to the union-approved pedophiles’ continued predations.
But maybe ‘Puter’s just hypersensitive. Maybe these teachers are really good guys whose actions were misunderstood. Judge for yourself.
One example: An arbitrator in 2007 found that teacher Alexis Grullon had victimized young girls with repeated hugging, “incidental though not accidental contact with one student’s breast” and “sexually suggestive remarks.” The teacher had denied all these charges. In the end the arbitrator found him “unrepentant,” yet punished him with only a six-month suspension.
Another example from 2007: Teacher William Scharbach was found to have inappropriately touched and held young boys. “Respondent’s actions at best give the appearance of impropriety and at worst suggest pedophilia,” wrote the arbitrator—before giving the teacher only a reprimand. The teacher didn’t deny the touching but denied that it was inappropriate.
Then there was teacher Steven Ostrin, who in 2010 was found to have asked a young girl to give him a striptease, harassed students by text, and engaged in sexual banter. The arbitrator in his case concluded that since the teacher hadn’t actually solicited sex from students, the charges—all of which the teacher denied—warranted only a suspension.
‘Puter, as his company’s compliance officer, would fire an employee on the spot for behaving as the “teachers gone wild” did above. And in ‘Puter’s office, the harassed party would at least be an adult, not a defenseless child.
Yet the Democrats continue to take countless millions of dollars annually from the union captured educations industry, knowing full well that their generous (with other people’s money) union benefactors are aiding and abetting the return of child molesters to the classroom. And before any of you liberal yahoos start angrily sputtering that a few bad apples don’t ruin the bunch, ‘Puter’s got four words for you before he punches you in your tofu-chewing teeth: Catholic Church Sex Scandal.
‘Puter doesn’t want to hear it from any Democrat politician or any Democrat voter any more. Every discussion about the Catholic Church’s position on any issue, from transubstantiation to abortion to gay marriage is met with a spittle-flecked, red-faced moron screaming some version of “ZOMG!!1! CATHOLICKS IS KID RAPURS!!1!!!one!!” Usually, this is the moron’s leading response to ‘Puter, rather than a last resort when it’s clear he’s been bested on logic and reason. And, not for nothing, priests have a lower incidence of child molestation than do public school teachers, so suck it, haters.
If you support the teachers’ unions, you are supporting a course of conduct almost identical to that of some in the Catholic Church’s hierarchy when confronted with plain instances of pedophilia: return the molesters to duty and don’t warn anyone. If you’re taking the teachers’ union’s money knowing full well they’re returning molesters to the classroom, you’re complicit in the unions’ pedophile enabling activities.
For the record, ‘Puter doesn’t excuse, condone or tolerate the Catholic Church’s organizational behavior during its pedophilia scandal. But at least those who looked the other way, permitting the molester priests to continue molesting are finally being called to account. Can you say the same for the teachers unions? Not yet you can’t.
The Democrats will never willingly permit its money laundering public sector unions (taxpayer money to public employees wages to mandated closed shop union dues to campaign contributions) to suffer any real consequences. Why should the Democrats? The unions’ victims are just poor children, and the money’s good. After all, we Democrats don’t have to watch the kids endure the molestation, or watch the kids and families endure the consequences of the molestation for years. And we Democrats also are doing Big and Good Things with the blood money campaign contributions. The ends justify the means, right? RIGHT?!?
If the Democrats really need to condone child rape to support their campaigns, they should be more honest about it and open a bordello chock full of kids at the next National Education Association convention. Or is it the Democratic National Convention? It’s tough to tell the two apart, since they’re attended by almost exactly the same cohort.
What’s worse? Allowing pedophiles to return to their jobs to protect your organization (Catholic Church) or allowing pedophiles to return to their jobs in return for 30 pieces of silver campaign contributions (teachers’ unions)? Both are so ghastly, ‘Puter can’t say with certainty, other than he’s darned sure both parties are going to Hell.
Enjoy pulling the lever for President Obama in November. And remember, if you do so, you’re complicit in child rape.
Always right, unless he isn’t, the infallible Ghettoputer F. X. Gormogons claims to be an in-law of the Volgi, although no one really believes this.
’Puter carefully follows economic and financial trends, legal affairs, and serves as the Gormogons’ financial and legal advisor. He successfully defended us against a lawsuit from a liquor distributor worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid deliveries of bootleg shandies.
The Geep has an IQ so high it is untestable and attempts to measure it have resulted in dangerously unstable results as well as injuries to researchers. Coincidentally, he publishes intelligence tests as a side gig.
His sarcasm is so highly developed it borders on the psychic, and he is often able to insult a person even before meeting them. ’Puter enjoys hunting small game with 000 slugs and punt guns, correcting homilies in real time at Mass, and undermining unions. ’Puter likes to wear a hockey mask and carry an axe into public campgrounds, where he bursts into people’s tents and screams. As you might expect, he has been shot several times but remains completely undeterred.
He assures us that his obsessive fawning over news stories involving women teachers sleeping with young students is not Freudian in any way, although he admits something similar once happened to him. Uniquely, ’Puter is unable to speak, read, or write Russian, but he is able to sing it fluently.
Geep joined the order in the mid-1980s. He arrived at the Castle door with dozens of steamer trunks and an inarticulate hissing creature of astonishingly low intelligence he calls “Sleestak.” Ghettoputer appears to make his wishes known to Sleestak, although no one is sure whether this is the result of complex sign language, expert body posture reading, or simply beating Sleestak with a rubber mallet.
‘Puter suggests the Czar suck it.