Justice Ginsburg Is A Racist Asshat, But Dana Milbank Thinks Justice Alito Making Faces At Her Is Worse

Earlier this morning in his post on Fisher v. University of Texas, ‘Puter closed by stating “Justice Ginsburg is a laughingstock and no longer should be permitted to take part in Court decisions.” ‘Puter promised to provide an explanation for his statement later today, and now is later today.

Dana Milbank, a Washington Post opinionator, climbed atop his soapbox this morning to take Justice Samuel Alito to task for the Justice’s alleged “middle-school antics.” Mr. Milbank has his panties in a wad because Justice Alito dares show his exasperation with Justice Ginsburg’s utter disregard for both precedent and the Constitution itself. Mr. Milbank is also piqued because Justice Alito reacted to President Obama’s outright lies leveled at a captive Supreme Court during the 2010 State of the Union address regarding the then-new Citizens Uniteddecision, a decision liberals blame for all manner of pestilence and plague, regardless of actual causality. But ‘Puter’s only concerned here with Mr. Milbank’s certitude that what he refers to as Justice Alito’s “mocke[ry]” of Justice Ginsburg is unwarranted.

Before we tear Mr. Milbank’s thesis concerning Justice Ginsburg’s totally unassailable awesomeosity apart, ‘Puter would like to address Mr. Milbank personally. Mr. Milbank, your column today removes any doubt that you are a vile human being. Your attack on a jurist not permitted to defend himself is cowardly, and your thinly veiled innuendo that Justice Alito hates women is borderline libelous, even given America’s generous protections of published statements regarding public figures. Your juvenile and partisan treatment of a sitting Supreme Court justice is beneath journalism generally and the Washington Post specifically. If you had any decency, you’d rewrite your column and apologize to Justice Alito. Asshat.

Now, on to Mr. Milbank’s sainted Justice Ginsburg. Justice Ginsburg’s own actions, more specifically her issued dissents this term, are worthy of the mocking treatment of which Mr. Milbank complains.

Here is Justice Ginsburg in her own words, first in footnote 2:

The notion that Texas’ Top Ten Percent Law is race neutral calls to mind Professor Thomas Reed Powell’s famous statement: “If you think that you can think about a thing inextricably attached to something else without thinking of the thing which it is attached to, then you have a legal mind.” Only that kind of legal mind could conclude that an admissions plan specifically designed to produce racial diversity is not race conscious.

Justice Ginsburg finds as a matter of fact that the University of Texas is using race to exclude individuals from admission to a course of study. A smart liberal would leave her conclusion unspoken. Justice Ginsburg is not that hypothetical smart liberal.

Moving on to apply her finding that the University of Texas’ affirmative action admission policy is facially race conscious, Justice Ginsburg states apropos of nothing (and certainly not in reliance on any version of applicable law or the Constitution of which ‘Puter’s aware) to state as follows:

I have several times explained why government actors, including state universities, need not be blind to the lingering effects of “an overtly discriminatory past,” the legacy of “centuries of law-sanctioned inequality.” Among constitutionally permissible options, I remain convinced, “those that candidly disclose their consideration of race [are] preferable to those that conceal it.

Accordingly, I would not return this case for a second look. As the thorough opinions below show, the University’s admissions policy flexibly considers race only as a “factor of a factor of a factor of a factor” in the calculus; followed a yearlong review through which the University reached the reasonable, good-faith judgment that supposedly race-neutral initiatives were insufficient to achieve, in appropriate measure, the educational benefits of student-body diversity; and is subject to periodic review to ensure that the consideration of race remains necessary and proper to achieve the University’s educational objective … . (Citations omitted).

Got that, everyone? Justice Ginsburg states, albeit in fancied up legal niceties, it’s perfectly fine to discriminate on the basis of race, no matter the damage to the victim, so long as the beneficiary of such discrimination is not white, and so long as the victims of such discrimination are not white. ‘Puter’s certain Justice Ginsburg would have no problem with a charter school for American Indians that excluded Black students in order to make up for the whole “we nearly wiped your entire people off the face of the Earth” thing. Or a Chinese-only university dedicated to the study of Chinese racial superiority in order to rectify the horrible treatment of Chinese-Americans over the years.

‘Puter assumes, following Justice Ginsburg’s race conscious liberal logic to its natural end, that Jews (self-hating Jews abound) and Asians (liberals don’t think Asians have ethnic and racial divisions – Asians all look alike to liberals) aren’t really minorities all because they’ve out-Whiteyed Whitey hisself.

Justice Alito is not wrong to mock Justice Ginsburg. She’s self-beclowning, ripe for mockery. She’s also as dangerous as Satan on a three-day bender.

Justice Ginsburg believes she is a law unto herself, that only she can see America for what it is, and she’s not about to be limited by concepts as quaint as judicial restraint, or precedent or the plain meaning of the Constitution. Before shuffling off her mortal coil, Justice Ginsburg has embarked upon a jihad to create an America consistent with her own twisted logic regardless of cost.

And that, Mr. Milbank, is why Justice Ginsburg earned Justice Alito’s scorn, whether you choose to acknowledge reality or not.

'Puter

Always right, unless he isn’t, the infallible Ghettoputer F. X. Gormogons claims to be an in-law of the Volgi, although no one really believes this.

’Puter carefully follows economic and financial trends, legal affairs, and serves as the Gormogons’ financial and legal advisor. He successfully defended us against a lawsuit from a liquor distributor worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpaid deliveries of bootleg shandies.

The Geep has an IQ so high it is untestable and attempts to measure it have resulted in dangerously unstable results as well as injuries to researchers. Coincidentally, he publishes intelligence tests as a side gig.

His sarcasm is so highly developed it borders on the psychic, and he is often able to insult a person even before meeting them. ’Puter enjoys hunting small game with 000 slugs and punt guns, correcting homilies in real time at Mass, and undermining unions. ’Puter likes to wear a hockey mask and carry an axe into public campgrounds, where he bursts into people’s tents and screams. As you might expect, he has been shot several times but remains completely undeterred.

He assures us that his obsessive fawning over news stories involving women teachers sleeping with young students is not Freudian in any way, although he admits something similar once happened to him. Uniquely, ’Puter is unable to speak, read, or write Russian, but he is able to sing it fluently.

Geep joined the order in the mid-1980s. He arrived at the Castle door with dozens of steamer trunks and an inarticulate hissing creature of astonishingly low intelligence he calls “Sleestak.” Ghettoputer appears to make his wishes known to Sleestak, although no one is sure whether this is the result of complex sign language, expert body posture reading, or simply beating Sleestak with a rubber mallet.

‘Puter suggests the Czar suck it.